World’s First Live Search Engine To Be Launched
I just came cross an interesting article that entitled, “Mylivesearch aims for beta to better,” that caught the eyes of Google. My Live Search, indeed has been developed in the Down Under for the past eight (8) years and self-funded. According to the creator, Robert Gabriel said his search engine gives better, more relevant results than the search king because it is a truly “live” search, by means of a a small browser plug-in. Furthermore, My Live Search can also search the so-called “invisible web” of dynamically-generated web pages that search engines have trouble indexing, as quoted by him.
Though some said “Talk is Cheap,” but the reality is some talks are not cheap. but And I will reserve my viewpoint or any judgement until we all see this search engine goes live in June next month.
June 12th, 2007 at 10:12 am
Looks like a good idea and makes sense lets see how it pans out. Best of luck Gabriel.
August 31st, 2007 at 4:08 am
[...] MyLiveSearch has released its public beta version on last August 29. In order to use the service, one must download their search plugin, a small executable file in the browser. The method MyLiveSearch used was unclear to most people as their patent technology still pending as in today. When I entered some search keywords, the query that MyLiveSearch returned was “trawl”, as stated by them by using an user’s computer. On their landing page, they said they’ll use the user’s PC and your computer will in turn become the search engine. If you notice the search results that MyLiveSearch return, the search results will appear in a one-page layout format and it takes some time for this plugin to fetch the results. Moreover, the number of results found as well as the ranking of the top sites will not be the same if you enter the same keyword twice in the search bar. If you scroll down the page, MyLiveSearch has omitted some results, they named those as “poor results” in order to demonstrate the most best results. How they define “poor results” was not clear at this moment, maybe they’re ranking very low in terms of Google’s Page Rank or users never follow the headings and/or subheadings of these “poor” sites to find any other relevant Web pages. [...]